Hearing In The Gyanvapi Masjid Case Is Over

Hearing in the Gyanvapi Masjid case is over, and a hearing will be held tomorrow on the application of Anjuman Inazaniya Masajid.

A hearing in the Gyanvapi Masjid case is to be held in court today. There has been a ruckus on the campus since morning regarding the next hearing of the Gyanvapi case.

The hearing is to be held regarding the replacement of the Advocate Commissioner, the report of the survey done so far will also be submitted.

While the collected evidence is also ready to be handed over during the video recording. Although the hearing will start at 2 pm in the morning all the parties were seen busy with preparations.

The hearing began in the court at the scheduled time of 2 pm. The hearing on the commission proceedings of the Gyanvapi campus continued till 4 pm.

Meanwhile, the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ravi Kumar Diwakar has fixed the date of May 11 for an advance hearing on the application filed by Anjuman Inazaniya Masajid.

The hearing was held on Monday on the application filed in the court of Civil Judge (Senior Division) by Ravi Kumar Diwakar on behalf of the Anjuman Inazaniya Masajid Committee.

The application was filed to replace the Advocate Commissioner, who was conducting the commission proceedings in the Gyanvapi campus, which became the subject of discussion across the country.

During the hearing which lasted for about an hour, the advocates of the plaintiffs and the Advocate Commissioner Ajay Kumar Mishra have termed the allegations of the advocates of the Anjuman Inazaniya Masajid Committee as baseless.

At the same time, former Mahant Vice-Chancellor Tiwari has given further impetus to the discussions by saying that Baba Vishwanath’s Shivling was seen on the premises before 1992.

On the other hand, the plaintiff side appealed for directions from the administration to ensure the commission’s proceedings.

At the same time, he demanded to order the district administration to open the lock of the cellar and conduct the commission proceedings.

The advocates of the Anjuman Prajataniya Masajid Committee sought time to present their side on this appeal of the plaintiffs. Continuing the hearing, the court fixed the date for May 10.

However, the date of 10 May was already fixed for hearing on the proceedings of the commission in the Gyanvapi campus case. Now the matter has to be churned for hearing on behalf of all the parties.

In fact, the Hindu side has also approached the court regarding the survey of the basement present inside the Gyanvapi Mosque.