Madras High Court Gave Very Important Verdict On Rath Yatra

Madras High Court gave a very important verdict on religious events: Country’s eye-opening verdict. After the order of Madras High Court, the administration should stop kneeling before religious persecutions.

About two weeks ago, the Madras High Court gave a very important verdict on the right of each sect on the use of public places for religious events.

The whole country needs to debate on this decision. The dispute of Kadtur village in Perambalur district came up before the Madras High Court.

Matter challenging the order by the Sessions Court to limit the route of the Rath Yatra, which had been taking place for years, under pressure from the Muslim side.

It is worth noting that as per tradition in almost all the ancient temples, once a year the metallic form of the main Deity of the temple is taken for circumambulation in the surrounding area.

Since there are hardly any ancient temples left in North India, this tradition is often lost here, but in many temples in South India, this tradition is carried out with full devotion and enthusiasm.

The rath yatra of the four major temples of Kadthur continued uninterrupted till 2011, but from 2012 the Jamaat started opposing it.

The Muslim side said that since the Muslim population in the village is large, and in Islamic belief, worship of Idol is a sin.

So the Rath Yatras and other Hindu festivities should be banned in Muslim areas. This argument was an example of audacious intolerance as well as audacity.

Madras High Court strongly reprimanded, can roads also be religious

Taking a sharp rebuke to the Jamaat, a bench of Justice Kripakaran and Justice Velmurugan of the Madras High Court asked that groups can be religious and individuals can be communal, but can roads also be religious?

Allowing the Hindu side to travel through all the routes of the village as before, the Bench reminded the Jamaat that if its rationale was accepted.

There could be no Muslim event in any part of Hindu-majority India, nor any the procession may be allowed to evacuate.

It is a matter of great sadness that Hindus, despite being a majority in India, have to go to the court to protect fundamental rights like worship.

The worrying aspect of this episode is that the Jamaat has tried to present its staunch, religious misdeeds as an argument in the judiciary of a secular country.  However, this audacity did not originate suddenly.

This is a result of the tendency of the imposition of its Sharia Nizam on non-Muslims and the increasing slavery of the Salafi-Wahhabi influence, as well as the continued slackness of the regime.

Tamil Nadu Tauheed Jamaat took out a rally against idolatry and polytheism.

In 2016, Tamil Nadu Tauheed Jamaat took out a huge rally against the idolatry and polytheism in the city of Tiruchirappalli in Tamil Nadu.

Attended the rally and the speakers took an oath to openly establish Sharia Nizam by eliminating the idolatry and worship of the Mazars from India.

At the rally, Muslim leader Abdul Rahim declared that the opposition to idol worship is the basic character of Islam and that the opposition from giving voice to this protest would disrupt their religious freedom provided by the constitution.

The posters of this rally were put up all over Tamil Nadu and especially near temples. The demand by the Hindu organization, Hindu Makkal Katchi, to stop this radical rally was turned down by the regime.

Many Muslim organizations also opposed this rally.

The Madras High Court turned down the demand of a Muslim petitioner, Mohammed Feroz Khan, to stop such a hostile event, stating that he could not order any stop to be held peacefully.

The funny thing is that one judge in this bench of two judges was Justice Kripakaran himself. Now such anti-Shrif rallies have become an annual event in Tamil Nadu.

Official apathy: The paths of Hindu processions are changed.

It is a result of the increasing fanaticism and official apathy that the processions like Rama Navami, Ganesh Chaturthi and Durga Puja are either attempted to stop or are stoned across the country.

The administration also cries out against the fanaticism of the Shirk opposition by calling for peace. The former Akhilesh government of Uttar Pradesh and Mamta government of Bengal have been quite infamous in this matter.

It is a result of this inflexible governmental attitude that the paths of Hindu processions are changed. This creates a sense in the minds of fundamentalists to justify their religious beliefs.

This belief has become so strong that they are beginning to feel self-governed and disenfranchised for their populated areas. Attempts are made to curb disliked political and religious activities in these areas.

There was also fierce violence in Bomminaikanpatti village near Periyakulam town in Tamil Nadu when the funeral procession of a Dalit deceased was stopped in the Muslim population area.

Similarly, after the objection of the Muslim side in Sambankalam village of Tenkasi, the police demolished the temple under construction without listening to the Hindu side.