Temple Mosque Dispute Reached Supreme Court Again
Temple mosque dispute reached court again, Supreme Court seeks response from Center
The Supreme Court on Friday issued a notice on the petition challenging the Places of Worship Act i.e. Religious Places Act, 1991, and sought response from the Central Government.
That is, the court will now review the law in which it was said that the religious place of which the character is in 1947 will remain. Such a law was made to end the dispute of the temple mosque.
There were many such cases across the country where two communities were claiming their claim at a religious place. Such as Ayodhya, Mathura, and Kashi.
To solve this dispute, the government had enacted a law in 1991 that in 1947, the religious place will remain the same. Only the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi case of Ayodhya was kept separate from this law.
The Supreme Court has pronounced its final verdict on Ram Janmabhoomi. But the case of Mathura and Kashi is still pending.
According to the 1991 law, that religious places cannot be changed. That is, the disputed site of Mathura and Kashi will remain a mosque.
Therefore, BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay has challenged that law by filing a petition in the Supreme Court. They say that this is a violation of their religious authority.
The Supreme Court will now decide whether the Religious Places Act of 1991 is correct or not. The petition states that there are hundreds of such temples, which were converted into mosques during the Muslim rule.
But because of the 1991 law, Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists cannot take back their religious place. Therefore, this law is non-constitutional.
What is AIOS and how India’s enemies have been tightened.
A new ceasefire agreement has been reached between India and Pakistan on the Line of Control (LoC). Even after this, sticky bombs were recovered in different sensitive places in Kashmir recently.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defense referred to a more robust system for security along the borders of Kashmir. This is called Anti-infiltration Obstacle System (AIOS), which will work not only on technology but also on human resources.
Even after the agreement on 25 February, the army is on high alert in Kashmir on the possibility of the situation not appearing normal.
Its main focus is to eliminate Pakistani infiltration on the border or the delivery of weapons from there. Please tell that Pakistani terrorists kept trying to break into the security of the state through the extremists of Kashmir.
