Arnab Goswami Case: Supreme Court’s Strict Comment

November 11, 2020 daknewsnetwork

Arnab Goswami Case: Supreme Court’s strict comment – Who otherwise we will protect personal liberty. The interim bail plea of Republic TV Editor-in-Chief Arnab Goswami is being heard in the Supreme Court.

Meanwhile, senior advocate Harish Salve on behalf of Arnab Goswami has demanded the CBI investigate the matter. Arnab had challenged the Bombay High Court’s denial of bail in the Supreme Court.

During the hearing, Justice Chandrachud said, ‘If we as a Constitutional Court do not protect personal liberty, then who will? … If a state intentionally targets a person, a strong message needs to be given.

Our democracy is exceptionally flexible.

During the debate on Arnab’s bail plea, Harish Salve said that the powers of the state were being misused, ignoring malice and facts. An FIR was registered in this case in May 2018. The powers are being misused to double-check.

The Bombay High Court had refused to grant interim bail to Arnab and two others in the case for allegedly abetting interior designer Anvay Naik to go to the local court for relief.

Please tell that Alibag Police wants police custody of Arnab. Seeking this, the prosecution’s special public prosecutor P Gharat said Arnab’s arrest was necessary, as the letter written before Anvay’s suicide was his name.

If the arrest was not necessary, the magistrates would not allow him to be questioned in judicial custody. A bail application was filed in the Raigad Sessions Court on Tuesday afternoon by Arnab’s lawyers.

In the application, Arnab has declared himself innocent and said that the entire investigation into the suicide for which he was arrested for abetment has already been done.

Raigad police have submitted their A-Summary (Closure Report) in Raigad Chief Judicial Magistrate’s court in 2019 in this case. The bail application states that the applicant is willing to cooperate fully with the investigating agencies.

Arnab has admitted that there was a commercial agreement between Anvay’s company Kancard and his company ARG.

Under this, some work was yet to be done by Kancard in his studio. Therefore ARG stopped payment of Rs 74,23,014 of Canard. But the matter was between the two companies.